Quantcast The McGill Tribune

OFF THE BOARD: The fight for men's rights

Carolyn Gregoire | Published: 12/1/09

  • Print
  • Email
  • Page 1 of 1
Discrimination against men has, understandably perhaps, never occupied a prominent position on the feminist agenda. Recently, however, the rise of the men's rights movement has led men's rights groups and feminists alike to call issues specific to male identity into question. A recent article on Slate's women-oriented webzine DoubleX entitled "Men's Rights Groups are Becoming Frighteningly Effective" has spurred contentious debate extending beyond the feminist blogosphere as to whether feminism should encompass issues of men's rights.

The article was triggered by the actions of men's activist group RADAR (Respecting Accuracy in Domestic Abuse Reporting) who gathered in Washington this October to lobby against issues such as false allegations of rape and domestic violence, unrecognized domestic violence against men, and child custody rights for divorced fathers.

Many women, and not only those who identify as feminists, are outraged by the measures these groups have taken. Rather than addressing the negative impact that patriarchy and gender stereotypes have on men and calling for change, RADAR chooses instead to undermine the prevalence of rape and domestic violence against women. Relying on hyperbolic claims and sensationalism - suggesting, for instance, that domestic violence laws represent "the largest regression in civil rights since the Jim Crow era" - RADAR succeeded in blocking the expansion of several domestic violence bills, such as the Violence Against Women act. [*Correction appended]

Though issues of men's rights and injustice towards men deserve attention, the anti-feminist approach employed by RADAR and many other men's rights groups in battling these issues is counterproductive and alarmingly reactionary. RADAR's attempt to take funding away from "discriminatory" women's-only shelters, rather than fighting for resources for male victims of domestic violence and sexual harassment, epitomizes this ineffectual methodology.

While it's true that all human rights are men's rights and that history is essentially a men's rights movement, discrimination against men should be a feminist concern because male and female rights are inextricably intertwined. Though a patriarchal society operates for male benefit, societal standards of masculinity are also harmful to men in real ways which deserve to be acknowledged. Rigid definitions of masculinity which narrowly cast men into aggressive, machismo, bread-winning roles are damaging to men, and further, they are damaging to men in ways that are also damaging to women. Following this line of reasoning, many feminists fight for fathers' rights as a means of countering the socially sanctioned notion that nurturer or caregiver must be a female-occupied role. A central objective of the feminist movement is debunking gender stereotypes, even when they apply only to men.

Male victims of sexual harassment, domestic violence, and rape deserve to be recognized and taken seriously, mothers should not be unjustly favoured over fathers in child custody proceedings, and individuals of both genders do not deserve to be systemically limited and harmed by rigid social definitions of masculinity. Feminist concerns and men's rights are not mutually exclusive, and should meet on the common ground of seeking gender equality - the irony of it all is that we're both fighting the same battle. As feminist Gloria Anzaldua suggests, "Men, even more than women, are fettered to gender roles … We need a new masculinity and the new man needs a movement."

Correction: The article's original version claimed that RADAR had blocked the passage of several domestic violence bills, including the Violence Against Women act. In fact, RADAR helped block the expansion of these bills. Also, the Tribune apologizes for previously claiming that many of RADAR's leaders were accused batterers.
Page 1 of 1

Article Tools

Send a Letter to the Editor


Viewing Comments 1 - 10 of 35

Christian J

posted 12/01/09 @ 8:07 AM EST

Ahhh, the usual hypocrisy from feminists..

Let destroy everything men stand for, let's destroy their education, their gathering places but keep the one's for women, let's ensure their health is ignored, let's put the male-haters in the White House to ensure all that and then claim that the only reason the men's movement is getting nowhere it's because they are not really trying. (Continued…)

Karl

posted 12/01/09 @ 8:38 AM EST

I'd like to some evidence of your claim that 'many of the movement's leaders are themselves accused batterers.'

As is typical of feminists, I'm presuming you cannot, otherwise you would have already - But, go on. (Continued…)

Pierce Harlan

posted 12/01/09 @ 9:15 AM EST

What has this author been smoking? ". . . all human rights are men's rights and that history is essentially a men's rights movement." Seriously? Um, no thinking outside gender politicized college campuses believes it. (Continued…)

Puma

posted 12/01/09 @ 12:49 PM EST

"It is also worth noting that many of the movement's leaders are themselves accused batterers."

Carolyn - you sound like Makhmoud Akhmenidijad. He was making similar accusations last summer, saying many of the opposition leaders during the contested Iranian elections are themselves western-stooges, accused western-spies, accused traitors, etc. (Continued…)

Marc A.

posted 12/01/09 @ 1:15 PM EST

Men's rights is about equal rights. Period. We have never asked for anything more than equal rights. Equal rights in family court, parenting rights, domestic violence policies, criminal sentencing, public health policies, military conscription laws, forced labor laws, rape laws, genital entactment laws, etc. (Continued…)

Steve

posted 12/01/09 @ 1:21 PM EST

"Men's Rights Groups are Becoming Frighteningly Effective"

translated means that men are no longer going into relationships and marriage with blinkers on. (Continued…)

Puma

posted 12/01/09 @ 2:10 PM EST

Carolyn makes more sense in the second page of her argument, that both genders must work together towards an equitable middle ground. However there is a lot of idealism here that may not be achievable in the real world. (Continued…)

Dean Tong

posted 12/01/09 @ 3:13 PM EST

As one of the veteran movers and shakers in the USA over the past quarter century, I can tell you with certainty there is no unified men's movement. And I don't know that "the new man needs a movement either. (Continued…)

(1 reply)   Details   Reply to this comment

Rob Fedders

posted 12/01/09 @ 4:33 PM EST

I don't think the Men's Rights Movement ought to sully their good name by allowing feminism to associate with them in any manner whatsoever.

Feminism is a sex supremacist movement based in Marxism. (Continued…)

G.Mathieu

posted 12/01/09 @ 6:26 PM EST

The Men's movement will grow and organize itself without the assistance of women.

Feminism is strictly for women, masculism is strictly for men.

There is no other way: in this day and age, it's everyone for himself. (Continued…)

Post a Comment

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

Advertisement

TRIBUNE - INVOCATION CODE *************************** BIG BOX 300 X 250 ***************************

Advertisement